Case No. 2025-PR-103
This timeline is limited to events established by the supplied bank packet, filed petition and order, transmission emails, and filed June 2025 response.
An observable date, amount, filing, or statement from the identified source.
A person's explanation is presented as that person's statement, not adopted as fact.
The precise point the record does not establish.
December 2024–June 2025
Volunteer State Bank notices report that Virginia's home, mobile, and other telephone fields were changed to Margaret Olea's number and the primary email was changed to Margaret's email address.
The notices do not identify who entered the changes or whether Virginia authorized them.
Virginia's bank statement reports a $750 ACH withdrawal described as “COMPLETE WEALTH COMPLETE W” with an identifier bearing Virginia's name.
Virginia's statement reports a $5,500 transfer to another account. The receiving-account report identifies Margaret Olea as primary owner and Virginia Olea as secondary owner.
The records do not identify the operator who initiated the transfer or decide whether it was authorized.
A Clio notice records a $5,000 payment submitted January 10 using Margaret Olea's card for a matter named for Virginia Olea. The receiving-account report shows the $5,000 transaction posted January 13 to Complete Wealth Preservation.
The description “trust request” and the posting records establish the payment mechanics, not legal permission.
The receiving-account report shows a $500 ATM withdrawal, after which the displayed account balance was $0.00.
Donald Olea sought immediate emergency appointment over Virginia's person and property and later appointment as traditional conservator. Complete Wealth Preservation filed the petition.
No physician's report, treating charts, bank statements, or supporting transaction records were included in the supplied petition.
The transmitting email says the attached petition was filed in Sumner County that day.
This source proves transmission to Phillip only; it does not prove service on Virginia or receipt by every relative.
The order appointed Donald Olea for a maximum of sixty days, transferred sixteen enumerated categories of authority, authorized control of bank accounts and benefits, appointed an attorney ad litem, and directed a hearing.
T.C.A. § 34-1-132(c) stated that an emergency appointment was not a determination of incapacity.
Complete Wealth Preservation transmitted the order to Phillip with the message “Please see attached.”
The response states that Donald and Margaret jointly discussed payment to the initial attorney and used “those funds” to start the conservatorship process. It also states they believed counsel said the use was permissible and that Donald would not seek reimbursement for those fees.
The filing documents Donald's explanation. It does not itself resolve authority, consent, fiduciary duty, or legal characterization.
Other events appear in working summaries, but their underlying docket entries, orders, medical reports, and law-enforcement records were not supplied for this publication pass. They will be added only after source review.